Continuity

We aren't limited to fanfic. Any writing that doesn't fit elsewhere can go here. Feel free to post poetry, stories, articles, ideas and any other fiction or non-fiction you wish.
Sheana_Molloy
Bootlick
Bootlick
Posts: 6881
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2001 4:47 pm
Contact:

Re:Continuity

Post by Sheana_Molloy » Wed Jan 14, 2004 4:20 pm

No, Skinner just walked quickly off.

Really, I don't see why people consider it a meta-reference like the guide book. The guide book is silly, but the 'Principal and the Pauper' bit is a ref to an actual episode that happened. It's a reference to something that happened in the past, though most people don't like that episode's events to be mentioned.
Image

Trace said he didn't see himself as an icon, but wanted to be a logo. Frank settled for being a font.
--MST3K interview

Peter Grant:  I'm the manager of Led Zeppelin!
Bob Dylan:  I don't come to you with my problems.
c_nordlander
Insane Underling
Insane Underling
Posts: 11489
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2001 2:00 pm
Custom Title: Running after something that I'll never kill
Location: Redacted, Redacticaster

Re:Continuity

Post by c_nordlander » Wed Jan 14, 2004 5:20 pm

Very good point, Sheana.

As I see it, though, any mention of Armin Tamzarian is *anathema* (no, not the witch girl) in Springfield, so... if you get away with naming him, that's probably a breach of continuity.

(And no, I for one didn't call it a meta-reference. I just compared it with the guide book joke on account of both being very blatant attempts to shock the audience. Oh well, I prefer that to trying to shock the audience with sex or mindless violence, but... meh.)
The noose draws tighter;
This is the end;
I'm a good fighter
But a bad friend;
I've played the traitor
Over and over;
I'm a good hater
But a bad lover.


Elinor Wylie, "Peregrine"
User avatar
Robbie
Trainee Technician
Trainee Technician
Posts: 173
Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2002 1:28 pm
Location: Worcester, UK
Contact:

Re:Continuity

Post by Robbie » Wed Jan 14, 2004 7:18 pm

Continuity is something that doesn't exist, at least not in any scientific or fiction form, in the Simpsons world. Maybe all this screwing with continuity is to confuse and agitate long term fans of the show, like Skinner being called Tamzarian even though fans think "The Principal and the Pauper" doesn't exist, or Grandpa's old farm suddenly being rebuilt after it got burnt down at the end of Grandpa vs Sexual Inadequacy. Or the Springfieldians taking all of the Simpsons' possessions at the end of "Miracle on Evergreen Terrace". Or Homer taking enough wounds in some episodes to KILL A MORTAL MAN! Where was I... Oh yeah, continuity is something us geeks try and wave in the face of Simpsons screenwriters, who are too out of it to notice...
I think this is sick. You're staring at a dot!
User avatar
SirMustapha
Junior Secretariat
Junior Secretariat
Posts: 3945
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2001 8:20 pm
Location: South of South America
Contact:

Re:Continuity

Post by SirMustapha » Fri Jan 16, 2004 6:59 pm

Well, Lisa herself said that cartoons don't need to be one hundred per cent real (*another Fernie walks past the window*); the problem is, where is the line that separates "cartooniness" to "ridiculousness"? I would admit that Homer being bitten by poisonous snakes and robots filled with venom is closer to the latter rather than to the former... but the question is more delicate than that.
"Inside the museums, Infinity goes up on trial
Voices echo this is what salvation must be like after a while
But Mona Lisa musta had the highway blues
You can tell by the way she smiles"

-- Bob Dylan, "Visions of Johanna"
Locked